MotoGP: Marquez defends Zarco, "If you are aggressive, others can do it too"

The HRC rider didn't find Rossi's sanction fair given that "He didn't gain anything"

MotoGP: Marquez defends Zarco, "If you are aggressive, others can do it too"MotoGP: Marquez defends Zarco, "If you are aggressive, others can do it too"

MotoGP Zarco Vs Rossi GP Austin– Marc Marquez also has his say regarding the contact between Valentino Rossi and Johann Zarco, which occurred during the Austin GP.

After the words of the pilot from Tavullia (which you can read here) and the Frenchman's response (that you will find here), the reigning world champion and winner of the American GP, ​​defends the Tech3 team rider.

These are the words of Marc Marquez at Autosport: “Yes, it was aggressive, but at the start of the race everyone pushes 100%.”

“I am an aggressive rider, Valentino is an aggressive rider. In the past we have overcome ourselves in a difficult way and I believe we will do so in the future too."

“If you are aggressive and overcome with determination, you have to understand that others can do it too. But it's always been like this, it's the races."

After the contact, the "Doctor" raised the bike and cut the curve, being sanctioned with the addition of three tenths of a second to the race time. However, the sanction did not influence the final result, which saw Rossi finish in second place. In this regard the HRC driver found the penalty useless, since the #46 “he didn't earn anything”.

Picture of Alex Farinelli

Motorionline.com has been selected by the new Google News service,
if you want to always be updated on our news
Follow us here
Read other articles in MotoGP

Leave a comment

23 comments
  • TONYKART said:

    The penalty was useless because in the end he gave up the tire to Pedrosa, usually but not when it comes to reds whoever cuts the track has to give up position, if he had been behind Zarco as it was supposed to be reds he would certainly have lost a lot of time to overtake him and take it off him and this would certainly have influenced the final result, with the farce penalty of the final 3 tenths he didn't lose anything. . . Years pass but the bad habit of putting on a show with reds giving him an advantage and writing about him as if he were the one who won has not yet stopped...
    First Maverick fighting with Dovizioso and on Sunday Marquez did another job, abysmal gaps in qualifying and in the race he doesn't even see them at the finish line so far away...not even a photo of those two, a two-line article
    Painful makes you vomit
    I can't wait for him to stop and with him his scum who are so passionate about motorbikes that they won't even watch a race anymore

    1. nandop6 said:

      As usual when it comes to Rossi you spout nonsense, the position must be given back in case of cutting the curve when you overtake, can Rossi explain to me why he had to give back the position given that it's not him who was overtaking but it was the one in front? Furthermore, the cut was caused by Zarco.

  • TONYKART said:

    Primo Rossi left a door open, not a door and Zarco got in, these are things that those who go to the track see in every race starting with minibikes, but since Sunday according to Rossi they haven't been done, yes according to Rossi What he threw out gibernau, the one who, to stay on the track after cutting the corkscrew, threw himself on a stoner, The one who accompanied Marquez off the track, but wasn't it a sport for men? but wasn't racing like that?! Rossi's words
    Sorry but did you invent the track cutting rule this evening?!!! for any reason, therefore regardless of contact or because it comes wide at a braking point, whoever cuts the track must leave the position, Zarco had cornered him and Rossi with the cut and stayed in front, this doesn't happen in any category on any track, even if Zarco hadn't come alongside but Rossi had cut he would have had to leave the position, it's an advantage not to take turns on the track? Do you understand?...

    1. nandop6 said:

      Since you know the rules very well, can you always explain to me that you follow the comments or read post-race articles because you alone maintain that Rossi should have given the position to Zarco? Don't you have a doubt that it couldn't be as you say?

      1. ueueue said:

        Oh God Nandop6 now Tonystark invents the rules and believes in them too..

        we are at the limit...

        it's an advantage not to take turns on the track. Do you understand? try to convince yourself..ahahahaha what a baller!

        All this for an entry like this and a cut that brought nothing to anyone... if Zarco, a great handler, had had more, he would have passed Rossi again shortly thereafter. but he didn't do it, in fact he walked away ergo..

        and this whole Corkscrew thing is still happening but stop it..
        When Rossi passed Stoner in the maneuver he tried to keep a minimum of trajectory and get back in.. when he did it Marquez clearly cut something "similar" to what Rossi did..

        the fact is that this Rossi always makes you kick your ass!!

      2. VDS said:

        Write something "technical" that makes you laugh????????
        Impossible, that's a task that you four or five scientists already perform perfectly when you unload all your incompetence in the nonsense you write.

      3. Bestlap said:

        EH EH.. Better day by day, you managed to make me laugh even without writing anything technical.. You can't even place the reply comments in the right place, it's a comment further under the right place, now I'll give you a map so if you apply yourself you'll get there, calmly, little by little you'll get there... I forgot, calling you incompetent is equivalent to a compliment...

      4. Bestlap said:

        Erm.. smart guy, there would also be the fact that you write scientists not scientists... You know, you don't understand anything about motorbikes but at least the grammar...

    2. Bestlap said:

      All Rossi's detractors have as a common trait falsehood and approximation with a good dose of IDIOZIA to mix everything together. In this case our SKARTO goes on and on about giving back the position but to give it back you must first have taken it and Rossi was in front of Zarca before the overtaking attempt and remained in front afterwards, so what did he have to give back...?? The regulation says that you have to return the position only if you gain one with the cut of the curve but this is not the case with the 0, Rossi gained 46 tenths in that cut and 3 tenths were taken away from him STOP, any further discussion is hot air. Stop SKARTO inventing "ad minkiam" regulations and statements never made by anyone, you already look like an imbecile even if you don't invent KA3ATE... The examples you then give are completely wrong, the buffoon corkscrew WAS NOT TOUCHED in any way Rossi's way THE CONTACT NEVER HAS BEEN THERE is no point in you continuing to peddle this LIE there are videos to prove it.. The truth is that Zarca's maneuver made at that moment (about halfway through the race) was completely useless, it put both riders in danger unnecessarily, it didn't even succeed because Zarca never put his wheels in front of Rossi and the Frenchman, he knew well that even if he had managed to pass it would have been useless anyway because he didn't have the energy to be with Rossi like then it showed. A maneuver like this makes sense on the last lap, certainly not in the middle of the race... The other truth, dear SKARTO, is that after the various pre-Qatar tests and practices you and the other IDI22TIs were already preparing the "de profundis" for Rossi, in your opinion it is now over, fruit, these 0 podiums instead were an abrupt return to reality, a bad cold shower, resign yourself, your nightmare is very present and doesn't seem to want to go away………………………………………… ………………………………………….

    3. VDS said:

      Hey PROFESSOR.. you broke the ball with your complaints, change the tone you're boring.. and have a laugh every now and then!!

      1. Bestlap said:

        Try writing something technical and you'll see how many laughs I'll have and not just me... Come on, laugh...!!!

      2. Bestlap said:

        See smart guy, this is where you should have answered...

  • whose said:

    I won't even comment on the facts you cite, you always have to add to shift the focus, for that matter MM copied them all, but those are fine...

    but let's get back to the topic... since you are so expert as to compare mini bikes to motogp... in your opinion, in the hypothesis that overtaking Zarco in that curve (indeed, those curves, at that point are 4/5 in series called serpentine) had been successful, if you carefully observed the trajectory that the Frenchman took, at that speed, in the immediate next corner he came long...... but what am I telling you to do......

  • TONYKART said:

    https://youtu.be/juEpctA70JM
    Zarco couldn't go long because he was a left-right! He slipped while he was setting up the entry and Rossi was waaay slower due to the mistake at the entry of the previous corner, he was in trouble, then as usual he never feels like he has anyone next to you, I don't know if you've ever been on the track but when you have someone on you the noise in your helmet has a doubling effect, as if you were listening to the same radio station with two different car radios turned on at the same time, so I don't mind Mr Rossi's bullshit. tell the story and the images speak for themselves!
    what was zarco supposed to do????stay behind even if rossi had made a mistake????and what's more you have to suffer the usual antics of rossi who goes on tv to act offended and give life lessons...maverick did well to send him to hell

  • supermariacion said:

    Skarto…Lost cause!

    1. TONYKART said:

      your mother is lost...

  • whose said:

    it's better after turn one….. but I said it before…. What am I telling you to do, especially since you too have been on the track, and perhaps with a motorbike with the same power as a MotoGP...

    1. whose said:

      but observe everything, not just Zarco….. and I gave you a good suggestion

  • nandop6 said:

    I give up.

  • VDS said:

    When someone is so opinionated and stupid that they criticize those who make a mistake by writing incorrectly, it makes any comment superfluous!!
    Real SLENZIATO?

  • VDS said:

    And now continue with your technique lessons... your 4 blog friends can't wait for you to "argue" for the next article with your stainless certainties and your absolute pearls, great professor of my cogs *** no!!

    1. Bestlap said:

      Did you feel bad about it, "scientist"...?? I took you back because yours wasn't a typo but one of ignorance, you're the one who acts so much like a "teacher"... And what do you think, however, of those who claim to judge others by giving useless and ironic lessons without, moreover, have the means required to discuss the topic with full knowledge of the facts..?? Meanwhile, if you go and read what Dovi says you will see that he fully confirms "my stainless certainties"... Do you think maybe it's a coincidence or a matter of luck..?? Dear my "scientist", if you pretend to be "in the know", make sure you know, so to speak, if you don't know things, "good luck"

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Related Articles